There are talks of AI in every single place, together with in buying and selling.
Let’s see if AI can generate a buying and selling plan for choices buying and selling.
There’s a proliferation of AI brokers, and new ones are all the time coming on-line – ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini by Google, Copilot by Microsoft, and many others.
Contents
For this instance, we are going to use Grok, developed by xAI, an organization Elon Musk based and launched in 2023.
When Grok requested what it might have to create an choices buying and selling plan as an choices vendor, it gave this response:
>>>>>>>
“To create a tailor-made buying and selling plan for you as an possibility vendor, I’ll want particular data to make sure the plan aligns together with your targets, threat tolerance, and assets.
Right here’s what I would like from you:
Buying and selling Objectives:
What are you aiming to realize (e.g., constant revenue, supplemental revenue, capital progress)?
What’s your goal month-to-month or annual return (e.g., 1-2% monthly, 10-20% per yr)?
Danger Tolerance:
How a lot capital are you keen to threat per commerce (e.g., 1-5% of your portfolio)?
Are you comfy with methods with outlined threat (e.g., credit score spreads) or undefined threat (e.g., bare choices)?
What’s your most acceptable drawdown (e.g., 10%, 20%)?
Capital and Account Dimension:
How a lot capital are you allocating to choices promoting (e.g., $5,000, $50,000, $100,000+)?
Is that this in a margin, money, or retirement account (e.g., IRA, which can restrict methods)?
Expertise Stage:
What’s your expertise with choices buying and selling (newbie, intermediate, superior)?
Have you ever bought choices earlier than (e.g., lined calls, cash-secured places, spreads)?
Are you acquainted with ideas like implied volatility, Greeks (delta, theta, and many others.), and margin necessities?
Time Dedication:
How a lot time are you able to dedicate to buying and selling (e.g., a couple of hours per week, day by day monitoring)?
Are you on the lookout for short-term trades (e.g., weekly expirations) or longer-term (e.g., 30-45 days to expiration)?
Most well-liked Methods:
Are there particular option-selling methods you like or wish to concentrate on (e.g., lined calls, cash-secured places, iron condors, credit score spreads)?
Are you open to directional methods (e.g., put promoting in bullish markets) or desire market-neutral (e.g., iron condors)?
Market Preferences:
Which markets or property do you wish to commerce (e.g., shares, ETFs, indices like SPX, futures, choices)?
Are there any particular sectors or tickers you’re comfy with or wish to keep away from?
Dealer and Instruments:
Which dealer do you employ, and what are their fee charges for choices (essential for profitability)?
Do you have got entry to instruments for analyzing implied volatility, likelihood of revenue, or commerce administration (e.g., Thinkorswim, Tastytrade)?
Danger Administration Preferences:
How do you wish to handle shedding trades (e.g., shut at a hard and fast loss share, roll positions, maintain to expiration)?
Are you open to hedging methods (e.g., shopping for protecting choices or utilizing VIX merchandise)?
Exterior Constraints:
Are there any regulatory or tax issues (e.g., buying and selling in a taxable account vs. an IRA)?
Any private circumstances which may have an effect on your buying and selling (e.g., restricted time on account of work)?
When you present this data, I can design a buying and selling plan that features the next:
Particular methods suited to your targets and threat tolerance.
Place sizing and capital allocation tips.
Commerce entry and exit standards (e.g., delta, days to expiration, premium targets).
Danger administration guidelines (e.g., stop-loss ranges, adjustment triggers).
A schedule for commerce monitoring and portfolio assessment.
In case you’re uncertain about any of those factors, let me know, and I can information you thru them or begin with a common plan based mostly on frequent option-selling rules.
What particulars are you able to share to get began?
Disclaimer: Grok will not be a monetary adviser; please seek the advice of one. Don’t share data that may establish you.
>>>>>>>
This response signifies that Grok knew what it was speaking about.
It knew that the affordable returns for possibility promoting have been 10% to twenty% per yr (or 1% to 2% monthly).
It knew that the capital in danger per commerce sometimes ought to be 1% to five% of the portfolio.
It knew that the buying and selling plan would wish to think about the dealer’s time dedication, account sort, expertise degree, and timeframe desire.
When asking in regards to the dealer’s threat tolerance, it prompt a most acceptable drawdown of 10% to twenty%, which is inside purpose.
At the least it didn’t recommend loopy drawdowns resembling 50%.
And at last, it provides the disclaimer that it isn’t a monetary adviser and that it is best to seek the advice of with one.
And never share private data on a public web site.
Subsequent, we feed it the knowledge that it wants by asking:
“Create a buying and selling plan on a $30k margin buying and selling account as an possibility vendor focusing on returns of 15% per yr. I don’t need drawdowns for greater than 10% whereas risking 2% of my portfolio per commerce. I desire expirations of 30 to 45 DTEs and am open to each directional and non-directional methods. I’ve no market desire and am keen to commerce indices, ETFs, and shares.”
And that is what it gave me:
>>>>>>>
Possibility Promoting Buying and selling Plan for $30,000 Margin Account
Annual Return: Goal 15% per yr ($4,500 on a $30,000 account).
Most Drawdown: Restrict to 10% ($3,000).
Danger per Commerce: 2% of account ($600 per commerce).
Choices Expiration: 30 to 45 days to expiration (DTE).
Methods: Mixture of directional and non-directional methods.
Markets: Indices, ETFs, and shares.
Beginning capital: $30,000 (margin account).
Margin Utilization: Use margin conservatively to remain inside threat parameters, assuming 2:1 leverage for choices promoting (e.g., Reg T margin necessities).
Month-to-month Return Goal: 15% yearly ≈ , 1.25% month-to-month ($375/month).
Danger per commerce: $600 (2% of $30,000).
Most loss per commerce is capped at $600, outlined by stop-loss or adjustment triggers.
Most drawdown: $3,000 (10% of account).
Stop buying and selling if the drawdown reaches $3,000 and reassess the technique.
Place Sizing:
Danger $600 per commerce, calculated because the distinction between entry credit score and stop-loss/adjustment level.
Instance: For a brief put unfold, if credit score is $1.00 and max loss is $4.00, the chance is $3.00 per unfold. Allocate $600 ÷ $3.00 = 2 spreads ($600 threat for 2 contracts).
Portfolio Danger:
Most 5 concurrent trades (5 × $600 = $3,000 complete threat, 10% of account).
Diversify throughout uncorrelated property to scale back systemic threat.
Free Wheel Technique eBook
Non-Directional Methods (60% of trades)
Quick Iron Condors:
Promote out-of-the-money (OTM) name and put spreads on high-implied volatility (IV) property.
Delta: 0.10–0.20 for brief strikes (10–20% likelihood of expiring within the cash).
Width: $5–$10 spreads, focusing on 15–25% of width as credit score (e.g., $1.00–$2.50 credit score for $10 unfold).
Markets: Indices (SPX, NDX, RUT), ETFs (SPY, QQQ, IWM).
Adjustment: Shut or roll if the quick strike is examined (e.g., delta reaches 0.40).
Danger: Outlined by unfold width minus credit score (e.g., $10 – $2 = $800 threat per contract).
Quick Strangles:
Promote OTM calls and places on low-beta shares or ETFs with excessive IV.
Delta: 0.10–0.15 (10–15% likelihood of expiring within the cash).
Markets: Shares (e.g., TSLA, AMD), ETFs (XLE, XLF).
Adjustment: Roll up/down or shut if the quick strike delta reaches 0.30.
Danger: Undefined; cap threat with stop-loss at 2x credit score obtained or $600 max loss.
Exit Guidelines:
Take revenue at 50% of max revenue (e.g., purchase again at $0.50 if credit score was $1.00).
Shut at 21 DTE to keep away from gamma threat until the commerce is deep OTM.
Directional Methods (40% of trades)
Quick Put Spreads:
Promote put spreads on bullish or impartial property after a pullback (e.g., RSI < 40).
Delta: Promote put at 0.25–0.30, purchase put 5–10 strikes decrease.
Markets: Shares (e.g., AAPL, MSFT), ETFs (XLK, XLV), Indices (SPX).
Credit score: Goal 20–30% of unfold width.
Adjustment: Roll down/out or shut if the quick put delta reaches 0.50.
Danger: Outlined by unfold width minus credit score.
Quick Name Spreads:
Promote name spreads on bearish or overbought property (e.g., RSI > 70).
Delta: Promote name at 0.25–0.30, purchase name 5–10 strikes increased.
Markets: Shares (e.g., NVDA, META), ETFs (SMH, XLY).
Credit score: Goal 20–30% of unfold width.
Adjustment: Roll up/out or shut if the quick name delta reaches 0.50.
Exit Guidelines:
Take revenue at 50% of the max revenue.
Shut at 21 DTE or if loss reaches $600.
Liquidity: Commerce choices with:
Bid-ask unfold < 5% of mid-price.
Open curiosity > 500 contracts per strike.
Day by day quantity > 100 contracts.
Implied Volatility (IV):
Goal IV rank > 50 for non-directional trades to maximise credit score.
Keep away from low IV (< 20%) for directional trades to scale back the chance of reversals.
Correlation:
Choose property with a correlation < 0.5 to diversify (e.g., SPY and XLE, AAPL and RUT).
Earnings and Occasions:
Keep away from promoting choices over earnings until IV crush is favorable and threat is outlined.
Monitor financial occasions (FOMC, CPI) for indices and ETFs.
Market Evaluation:
Weekly: Evaluation IV rank, technicals (RSI, assist/resistance), and upcoming occasions.
Day by day: Test VIX, sector efficiency, and asset correlations.
2. Commerce Setup:
Determine 2–3 non-directional and a pair of–3 directional alternatives weekly.
Prioritize defined-risk trades (spreads, condors) over undefined-risk (strangles).
Use 30–45 DTE choices to steadiness theta decay and gamma threat.
3. Place Sizing:
Calculate contracts: $600 ÷ (max loss per contract).
Instance: Iron condor with $800 max loss per contract → 0.75 contracts (spherical to 1).
4. Monitoring:
Test positions day by day for delta shifts or stop-loss triggers.
Regulate or shut if threat exceeds $600 or at 21 DTE.
5. Revenue Goal:
Goal for $375/month ($1,125/quarter).
Count on a 60–70% win price with 1:1 risk-reward on common.
Asset Courses:
Indices: 30% (SPX, RUT).
ETFs: 40% (SPY, QQQ, XLE, XLF).
Shares: 30% (AAPL, MSFT, TSLA, NVDA).
Technique Combine:
Non-directional: 60% (iron condors, strangles).
Directional: 40% (put spreads, name spreads).
Capital Allocation:
Deploy 50–75% of capital at any time (3–5 trades).
Reserve 25–50% for changes or opportunistic trades.
Day by day Log:
File every commerce’s entry, exit, credit score, loss/revenue, and rationale.
Monitor complete account worth and drawdown.
Weekly Evaluation:
Assess win price, common revenue/loss, and adherence to threat guidelines.
Regulate technique combine if drawdown approaches 5% ($1,500).
Month-to-month Evaluation:
Evaluate precise vs. goal return ($375/month).
Rebalance asset allocation if one class dominates losses.
Drawdown > 5% ($1,500):
Scale back place measurement to 1% threat per commerce ($300).
Shift to 80% defined-risk methods (spreads, condors).
Drawdown > 10% ($3,000):
Halt buying and selling.
Analyze commerce log for patterns (e.g., overexposure to at least one asset).
Resume with 0.5% threat per commerce ($150) after a 1-month pause.
Market Stress (VIX > 30):
Scale back publicity to 2 trades max.
Prioritize indices and ETFs over shares.
Asset: SPY (ETF).
Technique: Iron Condor (40 DTE).
Setup:
SPY at $500.
Promote a 460 put, purchase a 450 put; promote a 540 name, purchase a 550 name ($10 vast spreads).
Credit score: $2.00 ($200 per contract).
Max loss: $10 – $2 = $8 ($800 per contract).
Contracts: $600 ÷ $800 = 0.75 → 1 contract.
Danger: $800 × 1 = $800 (adjusted to $600 by way of stop-loss at 3x credit score, $6.00 debit).
Exit: Purchase again at $1.00 (50% revenue, $100) or shut at 21 DTE.
Rationale: Excessive IV rank (60), impartial technicals, no main occasions.
Platform: Use a dealer with low commissions and strong choices analytics (e.g., Tastytrade, Interactive Brokers).
Evaluation Instruments:
OptionStrat or Thinkorswim for likelihood and threat evaluation.
TradingView for technical evaluation.
IV rank information from Barchart or OptionAlpha.
Schooling:
Examine theta decay and IV dynamics.
Evaluation case research on iron condors and credit score spreads.
Taxes: Seek the advice of a tax skilled for short-term capital good points on choices.
Dealer Margin: Guarantee margin necessities align with Reg T (sometimes 20–25% of underlying for spreads).
Self-discipline: Adhere strictly to threat and exit guidelines to keep away from emotional buying and selling.
This plan balances threat and reward to realize 15% annual returns whereas retaining drawdowns beneath 10%.
Regulate based mostly on efficiency and market circumstances.
>>>>>>>
The buying and selling plan that it got here up with is fairly good and fairly detailed.
Based mostly on account measurement, it targets making $375 monthly (which is 15% yearly ≈ and 1.25% month-to-month on a 30k account).
The plan has threat administration consistent with the constraints I gave it.
It says to cease buying and selling when the drawdown reaches $3,000.
It took into consideration portfolio threat by saying to not placed on greater than 5 concurrent trades.’
It suggests diversifying into non-correlated property to keep away from systemic dangers.
Relating to place measurement, it says to threat $600 per commerce (which is 2% of the portfolio) and reveals easy methods to calculate the variety of spreads for a given credit score unfold.
It suggests a 60% and 40% mixture of non-directional and directional trades.
It specifies promoting the quick choices at 10 to twenty delta for non-directional condors.
In the meantime, for directional credit score spreads, it specifies having quick choices at 25 to 30 delta.
This fully is sensible as a result of we would like quick strikes nearer to the cash when making directional performs.
It says to prioritize defined-risk trades as a result of I didn’t specify whether or not I wished defined-risk or non-defined-risk trades.
It gave me plans for iron condors (outlined threat) and quick strangles (non-defined threat).
I’m glad to see that it made an essential level to cap the chance of quick strangles by exiting the commerce if the loss is bigger than two occasions the credit score obtained or a most lack of $600.
It remembered that we didn’t wish to threat greater than $600 per commerce.
It gave Further exit guidelines to take revenue at 50% of max revenue and exit at 21 DTE to keep away from gamma threat.
It additionally had good recommendations on lowering market publicity when VIX > 30 and lowering place measurement when the drawdown exceeds 5% (half of the max drawdown).
A really wonderful plan certainly.
AI is usually a great tool in our lives in lots of respects, together with in buying and selling, as we simply noticed.
Nevertheless, one additionally must know of its limitations.
There are examples the place an AI response was irrefutably flawed.
There are examples the place one AI agent gave a very reverse reply to a different AI agent.
General, the buying and selling plan that AI got here up with is an efficient plan to begin constructing upon.
You should still wish to tailor it to your particular buying and selling fashion and monitor how effectively the plan is doing to make changes to it as wanted.
We hope you loved this text on an instance of an AI-generated buying and selling plan.
In case you have any questions, ship an e-mail or go away a remark beneath.
Coated Name Calculator Obtain
Commerce protected!
Disclaimer: The knowledge above is for instructional functions solely and shouldn’t be handled as funding recommendation. The technique introduced wouldn’t be appropriate for buyers who are usually not acquainted with alternate traded choices. Any readers on this technique ought to do their very own analysis and search recommendation from a licensed monetary adviser.
