In This Article
Quick-term landlords would possibly not give you the chance to sh-sh-shake it off with regards to the extra taxes they could be answerable for. This follows the introduction of Rhode Island’s “Taylor Swift tax,” the nickname given to part-time residents who personal trip leases.
With different states following swimsuit, tensions are escalating between native municipalities, brokers, brokers, and the rich property house owners they symbolize.
What’s the Taylor Swift Tax?
The so-called Taylor Swift tax—formally generally known as the Non-Proprietor-Occupied Property Tax Act—will take impact on July 1, 2026. It imposes an annual surcharge on non-primary residences (i.e., properties not occupied by their house owners or tenants for no less than 183 days a yr) that are valued at greater than $1 million.
The surcharge is about at $2.50 for each $500 of assessed worth above that threshold. Utilizing these metrics, Kiplinger calculated {that a} $3 million property would face a surcharge of roughly $10,000 yearly, along with common property taxes.
The tax was named after the pop famous person as a result of Swift bought a mansion within the upscale Watch Hill part of Rhode Island in 2013, the place she is a part-time resident. It’s estimated that she might be liable for an additional $136,000 yearly when the brand new tax takes impact.
Proponents and Opponents
The objective of the extra levy, in accordance with the state, is to elevate income that helps housing initiatives whereas decreasing the variety of residences that stay vacant for a lot of the yr. Within the case of short-term landlords, this may very well be devastating to their backside line, as they’d not solely be taxed on the income they make as a landlord, but additionally from the Taylor Swift tax too, in the event that they hire the house for greater than 183 days a yr however not as a long-term rental.
The brand new tax has not been nicely obtained by many inside the true property trade. “These are individuals who simply come right here for the summer time, spend their cash, and pay their justifiable share of taxes,” Donna Krueger-Simmons, gross sales agent with Mott & Chace Sotheby’s Worldwide in Watch Hill, Rhode Island, instructed CNBC. “They’re getting penalized simply because additionally they stay someplace else.”
“You’re simply hurting the individuals who assist small enterprise,” Lori Joyal of the Lila Delman Compass workplace in Watch Hill, instructed CNBC. “You’re chasing away the individuals who spend a lot of the cash in these cities.”
Brokers concern that the tax might backfire on trip householders, who would possibly select to spend their cash on close by trip cities with much less stringent tax legal guidelines.
Different States Are Implementing Related Taxes
Montana
Montana not too long ago handed reforms set to take impact in 2026, which equally distinguish between main residences and long-term leases versus secondary/trip properties and short-term leases. The state skilled an inflow of recent residents from New York and different main cities throughout the COVID-19 pandemic.
Montana’s new system would require non-primary residents and short-term rental house owners to pay a flat fee of 1.90% starting in 2026, whatever the property worth. Nevertheless, properties used as main residences or for long-term leases can qualify for decrease, tiered charges, relying on market values, in accordance with the Montana Division of Income.
There are caveats to Montana’s program. Owners who stay of their residences for no less than seven months of the yr, or have long-term leases, might qualify for decreased charges and a one-time rebate for 2025, in accordance with tax compliance website Avalara. The positioning additionally estimates that second properties and higher-value properties will bear a higher proportion of the tax burden as a consequence of their greater tax charges.
Cape Cod, Massachusetts
Cape Cod is contemplating becoming a member of close by Rhode Island in taxing prosperous part-time residents. Nevertheless, relatively than an annual tax, Cape Cod will apply a “mansion tax” within the type of a 2% actual property switch tax on gross sales of over $2 million. Proponents argue that it might generate round $56 million yearly for inexpensive and year-round housing.
Rob Brennan, chief authorized officer on the nonprofit group Housing Help, instructed Cape Cod’s native authorities web site:
“This is now not a cyclical scarcity—it’s an existential disaster. And not using a everlasting, predictable supply of funding, we can not assist housing that working Cape Codders can really afford. There’s no approach out of this disaster with out daring, systemic options. The $2,000,000 house turning into $2,040,000 doesn’t cease second-home patrons.”
Conversely, full-time residents in Chatham, Cape Cod, will obtain a 35% property tax exemption as of July 1, 2026.
“The huge quantity of wealth on this city in residential property is held by a disproportionate quantity of people that aren’t residents of this city,” Chatham neighborhood board member Seth Taylor instructed the Cape Cod Chronicle. “I don’t assume it’s an excessive amount of to ask to take a look at this as a sensible approach to assist the middle-income of us that we are saying we wish to have in our neighborhood.”
Chatham and 10 different communities on the Cape and islands, in addition to six different cities and cities throughout the state, together with Boston, have adopted a residential tax exemption.
California
Los Angeles’ “mansion tax,” generally known as Measure ULA, imposes a 4% switch tax on property gross sales between $5 million and $10 million, and a 5.5% tax on gross sales above $10 million to assist inexpensive housing and homeless prevention applications. Nevertheless, the tax has not too long ago been underneath scrutiny and will be eradicated to encourage growth.
“It was bought as a mansion tax, which implies huge homes for wealthy individuals, nevertheless it really had a chilling impact on housing development, notably residences,” former Meeting Speaker Bob Hertzberg, who was tapped by Mayor Karen Bass to work out the small print of the legislative proposal, instructed the Los Angeles Occasions.
You may also like
Issues Quick-Time period Rental Homeowners Ought to Maintain In Thoughts
For those who personal a short-term rental in states like Rhode Island or Montana, you will want to pay specific consideration to:
The variety of days you reside within the property personally as a main residence versus the times you hire it.
Maintain data of residency use dates versus short-term and mid-term rental occupancy.
Weigh the earnings generated from the rental versus the tax payable by not occupying it to qualify for residency restrictions to calculate one of the best use of your property.
Ultimate Ideas: Grey Areas
I’d by no means advocate discovering methods to avoid the brand new guidelines, however there are some grey areas that astute buyers might make the most of.
For those who stay in a bit of your private home whereas additionally utilizing it as a short-term rental, your tax legal responsibility might be decided primarily based on the share of the home you occupy. In actuality, it’s unlikely that an IRS consultant will go to to confirm the apportioned use of your rental.
If sure areas, such because the kitchen and TV areas, are collectively used, their delineation turns into much more opaque. Throw ADUs, completed basements, and attics into the combination, and who lives in what elements of the property presents an fascinating proposition for an accountant who is aware of how far to bend the principles.
Conversely, and fewer doubtless to attract consideration, is to merely ramp up your short-term earnings as a lot as attainable whereas making the most of renovation and depreciation tax deductions. Pay the brand new taxes as required, and revel in a superb night time’s sleep.
