As outlined contribution (DC) plans proceed to evolve, plan sponsors face growing complexity in managing retirement advantages. With $12.5 trillion in property (3Q 2024) and accounting for one-third of all US retirement property, DC plans carry important accountability for making certain sturdy monetary outcomes for contributors1. In 2025, plan sponsors should concentrate on optimizing funding methods, lowering prices, and enhancing participant training to enhance retirement readiness.
The highest priorities for DC plans in 2025 embody vital areas akin to goal date fund choice, payment transparency, funding lineup analysis, and staying forward of regulatory and litigation traits.
Focusing on Goal Date Funds (TDFs)
The Division of Labor’s steerage, Goal Date Retirement Funds — Ideas for ERISA Plan Fiduciaries, outlines finest practices for TDF selection2. Key takeaways embody:
Establishing a course of for choosing and evaluating TDFs and for periodic evaluate
Understanding the TDFs’ underlying investments and the glidepath
Reviewing the TDFs’ charges and funding bills
Profiting from all accessible info within the evaluate and decision-making course of
Documenting the method
Growing efficient worker communications.
Implicit on this steerage are three key factors to think about. First, as with all funding course of, you will need to perceive the aim of the investments is to assist your distinctive group of staff make investments for retirement. Second, analyze the traits of the workforce by amassing workforce demographics, funding behavioral traits — generally present in stories produced by the recordkeeper — and different workforce information. Lastly, set up the plan sponsor’s objectives for the plan and total funding beliefs that can function a information when evaluating numerous TDFs. Making prudent funding selections requires these components to drive the evaluation and determine TDFs which can be appropriate on your workforce.
Understanding Funding Charges and Share Lessons
We frequently see conditions the place the plan sponsor goes by way of the trouble of discovering an incredible funding technique after which selects a less-than-optimal funding automobile.
For instance, a plan sponsor or its advisor may choose a mutual fund share class for which the expense ratio consists of revenue-share {dollars}, that are paid to the advisor or collected by the recordkeeper to credit score in opposition to its charges, somewhat than utilizing a zero-revenue share class. In different instances, a plan may be eligible (meet the minimal funding threshold) for a collective funding belief (CIT) automobile with a decrease expense ratio than the mutual fund model(s) of the funding technique. Usually, these decisions or oversights lead to plan contributors paying larger funding charges and recordkeeper charges than if the plan sponsor had optimized the selection of funding automobile.
We recommend plan sponsors take into account the impression on contributors of their present mutual fund share lessons, if not zero income, and whether or not the plan qualifies for identical CIT technique. We advocate plan sponsors use zero-revenue share lessons of mutual funds or collective funding trusts, as relevant, as they supply better payment transparency and infrequently decrease total charges, all else equal, than plans using revenue-sharing share lessons.
Evaluating Funding Lineup Construction
Most committees’ routine funding evaluations comply with an identical format: a have a look at the economic system and capital markets adopted by a evaluate of the efficiency and threat metrics of the funding menu. If there are funds on watch or in want of substitute, modifications are mentioned. Whereas routine evaluations of plan fiduciaries are anticipated, we advise supplementing with a periodic evaluate of the funding lineup construction, that means funding classes (Determine 1) and whether or not they’re applied with lively administration or passive administration. We recommend such a evaluate at the least each three years or earlier if workforce demographics change in a significant manner.
Determine 1: Normal Funding Construction.
In Determine 1, we present a generic funding lineup construction. To judge the appropriateness of the lineup construction, plan sponsors ought to begin by plotting the prevailing funding menu utilizing the columns proven. This visualization can facilitate dialogue about whether or not the present construction is acceptable or whether or not funding classes needs to be altered. Components for the dialogue might embody participant group funding information, age, demographics, and extent of retiree inhabitants within the plan.
Providing Complete Monetary Schooling Assets
In our 2024 Monetary Wellness within the Office Research, staff reported spending at the least three hours per week worrying about private funds, with 68% stating that monetary stress negatively impacts their psychological well being. And three out of 4 employers acknowledged that employees’ monetary stress negatively impacts office operations3.
We have now seen firsthand how monetary wellness advantages will help staff enhance their monetary well being and cut back these challenges. Whereas conventional group conferences have traditionally performed a big function — significantly for workforces the place a big proportion of the inhabitants shouldn’t be at a desk – there’s a significant enhance within the variety of plan sponsors and their staff in search of individualized one-on-one conferences with monetary educators. These non-public conferences allow staff to have candid conversations about their distinctive monetary challenges.
Inspecting Committee Construction and Obligations
Employment traits from “the good resignation” to “the large keep” and “the good reshuffling” illustrate the mobility of at present’s workforce. These modifications additionally negatively impression an organization’s retirement plan committee. Causes may differ from altering positions to leaving the corporate or retirement.
Committees ought to get again to the fundamentals in 2025 by doing the next:
Doc the committee construction and obligations
Construct an onboarding training guidelines for brand new committee members
Preserve a calendar construction for fiduciary persevering with training
Affirm the fiduciary file is updated, together with the funding coverage assertion, government summaries, and funding reporting
Monitoring Tendencies in Litigation and Regulation
With important provisions of the 2017 Tax Cuts and Job Acts expiring on the finish of 2025, there’s the potential for brand new tax laws. Modifications to tax-advantaged retirement applications can include tax laws, so it is going to be essential for plan sponsors to remain present on potential modifications.
From a litigation standpoint, two main traits formed 2024: plan charges and utilization of forfeiture property.
Plan charges stay a perennial focus. Has the committee fulfilled its fiduciary obligation to observe plan bills in order that they’re affordable for the providers offered? You will need to word that this matter covers each vendor bills, akin to recordkeeping and advisor bills, and funding administration bills, akin to alternative of funding supervisor or the share class utilized.
The present wave of litigation concerning utilization of forfeiture property is a brand new phenomenon. The litigation has targeted on whether or not plan sponsors are permitted to make use of forfeiture property to scale back employer contributions, or if they’re restricted to paying permissible vendor bills or distributing the funds to participant accounts.
With the potential for change and continued uptick in litigation, plan sponsors ought to collaborate with their advisors to remain on prime of those and different traits in regulation and litigation in 2025.
Plan sponsors play a pivotal function in shaping the monetary way forward for hundreds of thousands of staff. By prioritizing funding optimization, price effectivity, governance, and participant training, they’ll improve retirement outcomes and cut back fiduciary dangers. As market situations, workforce demographics, and regulatory landscapes evolve, steady evaluation and strategic decision-making will probably be key to making sure DC plans stay efficient, aggressive, and aligned with participant wants. By specializing in these six priorities, plan sponsors can drive significant impression in 2025 and past.
Disclosures
The fabric introduced herein is of a normal nature and doesn’t represent the availability by PNC of funding, authorized, tax, or accounting recommendation to any individual, or a suggestion to purchase or promote any safety or undertake any funding technique. The data contained herein was obtained from sources deemed reliable. Such info shouldn’t be assured as to its accuracy, timeliness, or completeness by PNC. The data contained and the opinions expressed herein are topic to alter with out discover.
The PNC Monetary Companies Group, Inc. (“PNC”) makes use of the advertising identify PNC Institutional Asset Administration® for the varied discretionary and non-discretionary institutional funding, trustee, custody, consulting, and associated providers offered by PNC Financial institution, Nationwide Affiliation (“PNC Financial institution”), which is a Member FDIC, and funding administration actions performed by PNC Capital Advisors, LLC, a wholly-owned subsidiary of PNC Financial institution. PNC doesn’t present authorized, tax, or accounting recommendation except, with respect to tax recommendation, PNC Financial institution has entered right into a written tax providers settlement. PNC Financial institution shouldn’t be registered as a municipal advisor underneath the Dodd-Frank Wall Road Reform and Shopper Safety Act.
“PNC Institutional Asset Administration” is a registered mark of The PNC Monetary Companies Group, Inc. Investments: Not FDIC Insured. No Financial institution Assure. Might Lose Worth. ©2025 The PNC Monetary Companies Group, Inc. All rights reserved.
