Non-public fairness (PE) buyouts introduce advanced monetary constructions that may make it difficult to trace portfolio firm efficiency. The usage of acquisition autos can obscure monetary reporting, which means buyers and analysts can have a tough time attempting to perceive an organization’s true debt ranges, profitability, and general monetary well being.
This submit is the second in my three-part collection. It explores the variations between working entity accounts and consolidated group accounts, highlighting key monetary discrepancies and what they imply for funding evaluation.
In my first submit, I demonstrated how the creation of acquisition autos to facilitate PE buyouts creates challenges for analyzing efficiency with the examples Topco, Midco, and Bidco. Understanding these autos (illustrated in Exhibit 1) is essential to achieve a transparent understanding of the goal group’s financials in the course of the PE possession interval.
Determine 1. Topco, Midco, Bidco.

After an organization is acquired in a PE buyout by such a construction, the consolidated accounts of the goal group will usually be recorded on the newly created Topco degree, whereas the working entity will typically file unconsolidated accounts. Different acquisition autos like Midco and Bidco may even typically file unconsolidated accounts. These accounts, nevertheless, might lack full monetary data.
In some instances, multiple firm within the group construction will file consolidated accounts. The important thing to recognizing which set of accounts is essentially the most related to completely understanding the group funds is to seize the entire group possession construction and determine which entity sits on the high of the company tree.

To additional complicate the method, the post-buyout consolidated reporting entity might change in the course of the PE holding interval. This typically occurs, for instance, when different buyers purchase a stake within the goal group or when the goal acquires or merges with different corporations. All of this may make precisely finding out portfolio firm efficiency from pre- to post-buyout a tough train.
Working entity accounts typically don’t seize the complete group capital construction, and in some instances, might lack monetary data altogether. Furthermore, they could not mirror the group value construction, as some prices could also be charged additional up within the chain – like at Topco degree — so profitability could also be stronger on the working entity degree in comparison with on the consolidated group.
What’s extra, the debt used to finance the acquisition is commonly solely captured on the accounts of a number of of the newly created acquisition autos, which means that the full debt determine on the stability sheet of the goal working agency could also be significantly decrease than the consolidated group determine. For buyouts which use a substantial quantity of leverage to finance the deal, this may naturally be of even better significance.

Consolidated Group Accounts vs. Working Agency Accounts
Desk 1 reveals a buyout transaction and stories the primary financials for each the consolidated group entity, created for the aim of the acquisition, with the unconsolidated working entity accounts. The transaction is the acquisition of Xtrac Restricted, a UK-based agency, by Inflexion Non-public Fairness Companions LLP, a UK-based PE investor.
Three autos had been created for the aim of the buyout: Viola Bidco Restricted, Viola Midco Restricted, and Viola Holdco Restricted. The latter car consolidated the group accounts in the course of the PE possession tenure. Panel A reveals the financials of the working entity, whereas panel B reveals the financials of the consolidated group entity.
There are variations throughout reported gross sales, belongings, and headcount, all of that are that are decrease on the working entity degree. However, EBITDA (earnings earlier than curiosity, taxation, depreciation, and amortization) is greater on the working entity degree. Quick- and long-term firm debt is significantly decrease on the working entity degree. These variations will naturally have implications for any monetary ratios that are calculated, equivalent to profitability and leverage.
Desk 1 illustrates Inflexion Non-public Fairness Companions’ acquisition of Xtrac Restricted in 2017 and its exit in 2023. Panels A and B evaluate monetary accounts of each the working entity (Panel A) and the consolidated group entity (Panel B), which was created for the aim of the buyout in 2017.
Desk 1. Consolidated and Working Agency Accounts.

I studied a pattern of virtually 3,000 PE buyouts in the UK over the previous twenty years and summarized my findings in a current analysis article. In it, I doc the distinction in PE goal group financials between the working corporations and the consolidated group entities. There are marked variations in gross sales, belongings, earnings, debt, and money holdings.
For instance, the median distinction in whole belongings within the first full yr after the buyout between the consolidated group accounts and the working agency accounts is 77%. The median distinction in whole debt is 244%, underlining that working entity accounts don’t totally mirror the dimensions of the portfolio firm’s consolidated group stability sheet. These variations are even better in buy-and-build offers, the place the goal firm acquires different corporations in the course of the PE holding interval.
Key Takeaways
Understanding the variations between working entity accounts and consolidated group accounts is crucial for correct monetary evaluation of PE-owned corporations. The proof reveals main discrepancies in reported belongings, debt, earnings, and profitability. But, these metrics can considerably influence valuation, danger evaluation, and funding selections.
Because the PE panorama evolves, funding professionals should perceive learn how to appropriately seize the complete image of a portfolio firm’s efficiency — particularly in leveraged buyouts and buy-and-build methods, the place these variations are most pronounced. In my last submit on this collection, I’ll study the implications these variations have when finding out the capital construction and efficiency of PE-owned firms, and I’ll make clear essential accounting parts of buyout targets’ stability sheets.